Stanwood v. Green

22 F. Cas. 1077, 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 134
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi
DecidedJune 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 F. Cas. 1077 (Stanwood v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanwood v. Green, 22 F. Cas. 1077, 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 134 (S.D. Miss. 1870).

Opinion

HIDD, District Judge.

The questions now presented arise upon the following proceedings:

The applicant being the supervisor of internal revenue for the states of Alabama and Mississippi, called at the banking house of Messrs. J. & T. Green, and requested to see the chocks received by them as such bankers on the previous day. which the Messrs. Green refused to exhibit; insisting that the supervisor, under the acts of congress, possesses no such right; and that, were such the provision of the act, it would be in violation of the constitution of the United States, and of no effect; whereupon the supervisor issued his summons directed to the Messrs. Green, requiring them to produce before him, at his office in Jackson, all books of accounts and papers containing entries of accounts between the banking house of said J. & T. Green and all other persons; which summons was duly executed, but which was not complied with. Whereupon application was made to me for a writ of attachment to com[1078]*1078pel said bankers to produce said books and papers; and upon proof of the execution of said summons, and the non-compliance therewith, the attachment was issued, and the said bankers appeared at the return thereof; and, by counsel, moved to quash the proceedings for the following reasons:

1. That the application showed no facts under the acts of congress giving to the district judge jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding.

2. That if the facts as stated were sufficient under the acts of congress to authorize this proceeding upon the part of the supervisor and judge, such legislative act would be repugnant to the constitution of the United States, and void. •

The first question for consideration is, what power and authority does the act approved July 20, 186S, confer upon the supervisor in relation to the examination of books and papers of a private banker? The act approved June 30, 18(54 [13 Stat. 223], provides that banks chartered or organized under a general law, with a capital not exceeding the sum of fifty thousand dollar's, and bankers using or employing a capital not exceeding fifty thousand dollars, shall pay a tax of one hundred dollars; when using or employing a capital exceeding fifty thousand dollars, for every one thousand dollars in excess of fifty thousand dollars, the sum of two dollars. Every incorporated or other bank, and every person, firm, or company having a place of business where credits are opened by the deposit or collection of money or currency subject to be paid or remitted upon draft, check, or order, or where money is advanced or loaned on stocks, bonds, bullion, bills of exchange, or promissory notes are received for discount or for sale, shall be regarded as a bank or a banker.

Section 110 of the same act provides that there shall be levied, collected, and paid a tax of one-twenty-fourth of one per cent, each month upon the average amount of deposits of money subject to payment by cheek or draft, or represented by certificates of deposit, whether payable on demand or at a future day, with any person, bank, association, company, or corporation engaged in the business of banking; and a tax of one-twenty-fourth of one per cent, per month, as aforesaid, upon the capital of any bank, association, company, or corporation, and on the capital employed by any person in the business of banking, beyond the average amount invested in United States bonds; and further provides for making monthly returns, and the payment of such taxes, imposts, penalties, &c.

Section 99 of the same act further provides that there shall be paid on all sales made by brokers, banks, or bankers, whether for the benefit of others, or on their own account, the following taxes, that is to say: Upon all sales, or contracts for the sale of stocks, bonds, gold and silver bullion and coin, promissory notes or other securities, a tax of one cent for every hundred dollars of the amount of such sales or contracts, &c. The act further provides that, in all such sales, or contracts of sales, there shaE be made and delivered by the seller to the buyer, a bill or memorandum of such sale or contract, on which there shall be affixed a lawful stamp or stamps, in value equal to the amount of tax on such sale, to be determined by the rates of tax before mentioned; and other provisions in relation to such tax, stamps, and penalties for non-compliance and violation, which need not be here stated.

Prom the above provisions of the internal revenue laws it will' be seen that a very considerable revenue is imposed upon these banking associations, and persons engaged in banking, and various duties are imposed thereon. And to determine what taxes should be paid, the books and papers belonging to such banks and banking associations should be shown.

By reference to the act approved July 20, 1868, imposing taxes on spirituous li’quors and tobacco, and for other purposes, it will be found that by section 49 of the act, after providing for the appointment of a supervisor of internal revenue, it is further provided that it shall be the duty of the supervisor, under the direction of the commissioner, to see that all laws and regulations relating to the collection of internal taxes are faithfully executed and complied with; to aid in the prevention, detection, and punishment of any frauds in relation thereto; and to examine into the efficiency and conduct of all officers of internal revenue within his district; and for such purposes he shall have the power to examine aU persons, books, papers, accounts, and premises, and to administer oaths, and to summon any person to produce books and papers and to appear and testify before him, and compel a compliance with such summons in the same manner as assessors may do, &c.

That there exists a necessity for taxation, and to a very large amount, is not denied. That the amount, the subjects of taxation, and the mode of assessing and collecting the same, are questions alone to be determined by congress, the law-making power, and with which the courts have nothing to do, it being their duty to expound and enforce the laws, is also admitted. It was competent for congress to provide for the appointment of such officers as might be deemed necessary for the collection of the revenue, and to prescribe their duty. The act stated has provided for the appointment of a supervisor, and has prescribed his duties: (1) To see that the laws for the collection of internal revenue are faithfully executed and complied with. (2) To aid in the prevention and punishment of frauds in relation thereto. (3) To examine into the efficiency and conduct of the revenue officers of his district. And to enable him to perform any one or all of these duties he is invested with these, extraordinary powers, as they are [1079]*1079termed, without which he would be unable to perform the duty assigned him.

It is contended by the counsel of the Messrs. Green that this power is only to- be executed in the same cases, and in the same way that assessors may do under the act of 1866 [14 Stat. 98). This is a mistake; • the powers are of a different character altogether; it is only when the summons is not complied with that obedience thereto is to be enforced as provided for in the case of non-compliance with the summons issued by assessors, which is to apply for an attachment to the district judge of the district, or to a commissioner of the circuit court of the United States.

It is contended that before the Messrs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. LaSalle National Bank
437 U.S. 298 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. Cas. 1077, 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanwood-v-green-mssd-1870.