Stanton v. Wright
This text of 55 A.2d 708 (Stanton v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The appellant was convicted of robbery in the Circuit Court for Harford County and sentenced to four years imprisonment. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas *304 corpus in Baltimore City, and appealed here from its refusal. The petitioner argues that the conviction was erroneous, that he did not rob anyone, merely accepted money from another man, with whom he went on a drinking party; that this other man plead guilty but did not incriminate the appellant. In short, the petition seeks a review of the sufficiency of the evidence. As we have repeatedly pointed out, we cannot review the sufficiency of evidence in a habeas corpus proceeding. Rexroad v. Warden, 188 Md. 498, 53 A. 2d 273; Nance v. Warden, 189 Md. 94, 53 A. 2d 554.
Order affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A.2d 708, 189 Md. 303, 1947 Md. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-v-wright-md-1947.