Stanton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stanton v. State

1930 OK CR 175, 287 P. 730, 47 Okla. Crim. 202, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 288

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 26, 1930·No. No. A-7313.·Published

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Jefferson county of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of eighteen months. He appeals from this conviction.

But one question is presented by this appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to* support the verdict of the jury. From a careful examination of the record we find there is sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the verdict. No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Jefferson county of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of eighteen months. He appeals from this conviction.

But one question is presented by this appeal, and that is the sufficiency of the evidence to* support the verdict of the jury. From a careful examination of the record we find there is sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the verdict. No error being apparent, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Stanton v. State, 1930 OK CR 175, 287 P. 730, 47 Okla. Crim. 202, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 288 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 175 (Stanton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.