Stanton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stanton v. State

471 S.W.3d 396, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 992, 2015 WL 5714845

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 2015·No. WD. 77802·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Sandra Stanton appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after she was convicted of second-degree murder, first-degree endangering the welfare of a child, and abuse of a child resulting in death. Stanton contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to prior bad acts evidence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Sandra Stanton appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after she was convicted of second-degree murder, first-degree endangering the welfare of a child, and abuse of a child resulting in death. Stanton contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to prior bad acts evidence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Stanton v. State, 471 S.W.3d 396, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 992, 2015 WL 5714845 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

471 S.W.3d 396 (Stanton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.