Stanton v. Stanton

73 A.3d 850, 144 Conn. App. 774, 2013 WL 3947768, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 392
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedAugust 6, 2013
DocketAC 34464
StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.3d 850 (Stanton v. Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanton v. Stanton, 73 A.3d 850, 144 Conn. App. 774, 2013 WL 3947768, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 392 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Christine Stanton, appeals from an order of the trial court granting her postjudgment motion for modification of the parties’ separation agreement. On appeal, the defendant claims [775]*775that the court erred in reducing the child support obligations of the plaintiff, Christopher Stanton, despite the finding of the court that the plaintiffs income had substantially increased.

After examining the record and the briefs and considering the arguments of the parties, we are not persuaded that the court abused its discretion in modifying the plaintiffs child support obligations.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.3d 850, 144 Conn. App. 774, 2013 WL 3947768, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-v-stanton-connappct-2013.