Stanton v. Stanton
Opinion
Opinion
The defendant, Christine Stanton, appeals from an order of the trial court granting her postjudgment motion for modification of the parties’ separation agreement. On appeal, the defendant claims [775] that the court erred in reducing the child support obligations of the plaintiff, Christopher Stanton, despite the finding of the court that the plaintiffs income had substantially increased.
After examining the record and the briefs and considering the arguments of the parties, we are not persuaded that the court abused its discretion in modifying the plaintiffs child support obligations.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
73 A.3d 850 (Stanton v. Stanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.