Stanton v. Pomfrey

266 A.D.2d 816, 698 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11707

This text of 266 A.D.2d 816 (Stanton v. Pomfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanton v. Pomfrey, 266 A.D.2d 816, 698 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinions

—Order affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Hurlbutt, J.

All concur except Hayes and Balio, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Cool
85 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Febesh v. Elcejay Inn Corp.
157 A.D.2d 102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Krampen v. Foster
242 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Greco v. Boyce
262 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 816, 698 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-v-pomfrey-nyappdiv-1999.