Stanton v. Pomfrey

266 A.D.2d 816, 698 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11707

Opinions

—Order affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Hurlbutt, J.

All concur except Hayes and Balio, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanton v. Pomfrey, 266 A.D.2d 816, 698 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 816 (Stanton v. Pomfrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Cool
85 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Febesh v. Elcejay Inn Corp.
157 A.D.2d 102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Krampen v. Foster
242 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Greco v. Boyce
262 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)