Stanton v. Parham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stanton v. Parham

103 S.E. 684, 25 Ga. App. 473, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 15

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1920

Docket11520

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 684 (Stanton v. Parham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanton v. Parham, 103 S.E. 684, 25 Ga. App. 473, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds; the evidence for the defendant in error, while not in all respects satisfactory, authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the [474]*474jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided July 14, 192Ó.

Foreclosure of lien; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Walker. April 12, 1920.

Colley & Colley, for plaintiff in error. C. E. Sutton, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI