Stanton v. . King

76 N.Y. 585, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 544
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 21, 1879·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Folger, J.,

reads for modification by inserting before the words “ striking out,” the words “ so far as,” and by striking out the word “ dismissed,” and inserting in lieu thereof this phrase, viz.: “ striclcen out;” and by striking out the words “ and from entering” mid inserting in lieu thereof, the words “so as to enter;” and by reducing the amount of costs allowed to twenty dollars, for making motion in Special Term, and for one appeal to General Term. And as modified, order affirmed, without costs to either party against the other in this court.

. All concur, except Rapallo, who is for reversal of order so far as it stays proceedings in this action, and Andreavs, J., absent at argument.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanton v. . King, 76 N.Y. 585, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 544 (N.Y. 1879).

76 N.Y. 585 (Stanton v. . King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co.
241 A.D. 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Brassington v. Rohrs
22 N.Y.S. 1053 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
United States Trust Co. v. Stanton
19 N.Y.S. 986 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)