Stanton v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stanton v. International Railway Co.

109 A.D. 910, 95 N.Y.S. 1161

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D. 910 (Stanton v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanton v. International Railway Co., 109 A.D. 910, 95 N.Y.S. 1161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order new trial ordered, costs to to abide event. McLennan, P. J., and Ñásb, J., voted for reversal upon the grounds that, as matter of law, the defendant was. not guilty, of negligence, and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; Spring and Hiscock, JJ,, voted for reversal upon the ground that thé verdict of the j.u-ry that the plaintiff was free from contributory; negligence was against the weight of the evidence; - Williams, J,, voted for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order new trial ordered, costs to to abide event. McLennan, P. J., and Ñásb, J., voted for reversal upon the grounds that, as matter of law, the defendant was. not guilty, of negligence, and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; Spring and Hiscock, JJ,, voted for reversal upon the ground that thé verdict of the j.u-ry that the plaintiff was free from contributory; negligence was against the weight of the evidence; - Williams, J,, voted for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D. 910, 95 N.Y.S. 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1905.