Stanton v. Henry

11 Johns. 133
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the case of Sallours v. Girling, in the ex chequer chamber, (Cro. Jac. 278. note,)(a) it was ruled tha where the bond of submission provided that the award shoul be under the hands and seals of the arbitrators, an award unde their hands, but without seals, was not good. This is an autho rity in support of the decision of the justice. Independent o this, however, the judgment ought to be affirmed; for it appears that a very great proportion of the plaintiff's account aros after the submission, and so could not be affected by the award admitting it to be valid.

Judgment affirmed, (b)

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanton v. Henry, 11 Johns. 133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

11 Johns. 133 (Stanton v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

French v. New
20 Barb. 481 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)
Bloomer v. Sherman
5 Paige Ch. 575 (New York Court of Chancery, 1836)
Rea v. Gibbons
7 Serg. & Rawle 204 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1821)
Hutchins v. Edson
1 N.H. 139 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1817)