Stanton v. Gasport View Dairy Farm, Inc.

244 A.D.2d 893, 665 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12227
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 893 (Stanton v. Gasport View Dairy Farm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanton v. Gasport View Dairy Farm, Inc., 244 A.D.2d 893, 665 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and new trial granted. Memorandum: Joanne Stanton (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict dismissing the complaint seeking damages for personal injuries plaintiff sustained when a motorcycle on which she was a passenger overturned. The jury found that defendants were negligent but that their negligence was not a cause of plaintiff s injuries. As instructed, the jury ceased deliberations after answering those two questions.

We agree with plaintiff that the verdict is against the weight [894]*894of the evidence. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Although a finding of causation “does not inevitably flow from a finding of culpable conduct” (Gaston v Viclo Realty Corp., 215 AD2d 174, lv denied 87 NY2d 804, cert denied 517 US 1169), in this case it is logically impossible to find negligence without also finding causation (see, Vera v Bielomatik Corp., 199 AD2d 132, 133; Bucich v City of New York, 111 AD2d 646). The jury found that defendants were negligent in depositing mud and liquid manure on the highway, or permitting it to remain there, and it is undisputed that the operator of the motorcycle lost control in attempting to avoid that material. Thus, the jury must have concluded that the accident was caused entirely by the negligence of the operator of the motorcycle or that plaintiff sustained no injury. Neither alternative is supported by the record. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J.—Negligence.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WILD, MARCIA A. v. CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Wild v. Catholic Health System
85 A.D.3d 1715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Murdock v. Stewart's Ice Cream Co.
5 A.D.3d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Dellamonica v. Carvel Corp.
1 A.D.3d 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Morgan-Caban v. Pacini
295 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Brenon v. Tops Markets, Inc.
289 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Passariello v. Lally
268 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Bahadur v. G. C. Construction Corp.
265 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 893, 665 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-v-gasport-view-dairy-farm-inc-nyappdiv-1997.