Stanton v. Button

2 Conn. 527
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1818·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Swift, Ch. J.

A court cannot, by intendment or construction, fill a blank, or supply a word. They can only decide on the meaning and import of the words made use of. Here the words madfe use of can only import, that the person appearing before the justice of the peace, was the signer [529] ami sealer of the deed : they do not import that lie acknowledged it, nor are they equivalent to such word. The certificate, then, cannot be made to contain an acknowledgment of the deed, without supplying the word, or supposing the. blank to he filled with the word “ acknowledged.” As this cannot be done, the certificate was no evidence ; and the deed was properly rejected by the court.

I think, therefore, that anew trial ought not to be granted.

The other Judges were of the same opinion.

New trial not to be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanton v. Button, 2 Conn. 527 (Colo. 1818).

2 Conn. 527 (Stanton v. Button) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhode Island Hospital National Bank of Providence v. Larson
17 Conn. Super. Ct. 28 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1950)
Plainville Electroplating Co. v. Dodge Brass Manufacturing Co.
15 Conn. Super. Ct. 423 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1948)
Bay City Shovels, Inc. v. Roach
2 Conn. Super. Ct. 19 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1935)
Coates v. Smith
160 P. 517 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
Larson v. Elsner
101 N.W. 307 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1904)
Lalakea v. Hilo Sugar Co.
15 Haw. 570 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1904)
Cabell v. Grubbs
48 Mo. 353 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)
Sanford v. Bulkley
30 Conn. 344 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1862)
Bours v. Zachariah
11 Cal. 281 (California Supreme Court, 1858)
Rushin v. Shields & Ball
11 Ga. 636 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1852)
Hayden v. Wescott
11 Conn. 129 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1835)
Case v. Humphrey
6 Conn. 130 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1826)