Stanton v. Adams

178 S.E. 154, 180 Ga. 142, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 198
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 19, 1935
DocketNo. 10272
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 S.E. 154 (Stanton v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanton v. Adams, 178 S.E. 154, 180 Ga. 142, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 198 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

A fi. fa. based on a judgment in favor of Stanton was levied on realty to which Mrs. M. E. Adams filed a claim. She relied for title upon certain deeds executed to her by her husband, which were prior in date to the judgment on which [143]*143the fi. fa. was based. The contention of the claimant was that the consideration of these deeds was money loaned and advanced by her to the husband long prior to the execution of the deeds. Stanton sought to have these deeds declared void on the ground that they were voluntary deeds executed to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors, setting forth that he had extended credit while title to the property conveyed by the deeds was in Adams. Upon the trial of the case both sides introduced evidence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the claimant, and the plaintiff in fi. fa. excepted to the refusal of a new trial.

There was evidence to authorize the verdict.

The charges excepted to were not error. The fact that the court did not charge the jury on the secret equities of the wife in the property conveyed by her husband to her was not error. The doctrine of secret equities was not involved in the case, the wife relying upon the conveyances from her husband. The question whether the deeds were voluntary, or were bona fide conveyances for a valuable consideration, and not for the purpose of hindering, delaying, and defrauding creditors, was fully and fairly submitted by the court to the jury. These charges presented the true issue in the case, and under the evidence the jury were authorized to find in favor of the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunt v. Commissioner
1988 T.C. Memo. 360 (U.S. Tax Court, 1988)
Brown v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
317 S.E.2d 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 S.E. 154, 180 Ga. 142, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-v-adams-ga-1935.