Stanton P. Bell, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
This text of Stanton P. Bell, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant (Stanton P. Bell, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
JUDGMENT No. 04-18-00129-CV
Stanton P. BELL, et al., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Appellants/Cross-Appellees
v.
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants
From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CI22093 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding
BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS
In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, that portion of the MDL court’s order denying Chesapeake’s Deemed Drainage Claims Motion (First Drainage Motion) is AFFIRMED. That portion of the MDL court’s order granting, in part, Chesapeake’s Deemed Drainage Damages Motion (Second Drainage Motion) is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that Compensatory Royalty shall be measured by an amount equal to the Royalty Share of Gross Proceeds of production from the entire Adjacent Well.
SIGNED March 13, 2019.
_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stanton P. Bell, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-p-bell-appellantscross-appellees-v-chesapeake-exploration-llc-texapp-2019.