Stansell v. Hyams

291 So. 2d 875, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4425
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 22, 1974
DocketNo. 4464
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 So. 2d 875 (Stansell v. Hyams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stansell v. Hyams, 291 So. 2d 875, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4425 (La. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

For trial and appeal purposes, this case was consolidated with In re: Forfeiture to Use or Sale of One 1971 Dodge Charger Automobile, 291 So.2d 872 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974).

On August 16, 1973 plaintiff Murrell Stansell petitioned for an injunction to restrain Harry T. Hyams, Chief of the Natchitoches Police Department, and Sheriff James from the continued seizure and possession of his 1971 Dodge Charger. On the next day the District Attorney filed the show cause rule considered in the consolidated case. Following trial of the consolidated matters, the trial judge dismissed Stansell’s petition for injunction and ordered the vehicle forfeited.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case, the order of forfeiture was set aside. That decision renders this appeal moot. Costs of this appeal are taxed to defendants.

Forfeiture order set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hilliard v. Richard
291 So. 2d 875 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 So. 2d 875, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansell-v-hyams-lactapp-1974.