Stansel v. State

114 S.E. 722, 29 Ga. App. 234, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 191
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 17, 1922
Docket13781
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 722 (Stansel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stansel v. State, 114 S.E. 722, 29 Ga. App. 234, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 191 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial contained the general grounds only; and the evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 722, 29 Ga. App. 234, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansel-v-state-gactapp-1922.