Stansel v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stansel v. Ford Motor Co.

86 S.E. 412, 16 Ga. App. 782, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 226

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 30, 1915

Docket5921

StatusPublished

This text of 86 S.E. 412 (Stansel v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stansel v. Ford Motor Co., 86 S.E. 412, 16 Ga. App. 782, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

There being no evidence that the plaintiff contracted with the defendant or with any person authorized as its agent to contract or to propose to contract with the plaintiff, nor any evidence that the defendant at any time ratified any negotiations on the part of any person purporting to act as its agent, a verdict in favor of the defendant was demanded by the evidence, and the merit of the various rulings upon the admissibility of testimony, to which exceptions were taken, is immaterial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

There being no evidence that the plaintiff contracted with the defendant or with any person authorized as its agent to contract or to propose to contract with the plaintiff, nor any evidence that the defendant at any time ratified any negotiations on the part of any person purporting to act as its agent, a verdict in favor of the defendant was demanded by the evidence, and the merit of the various rulings upon the admissibility of testimony, to which exceptions were taken, is immaterial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 S.E. 412, 16 Ga. App. 782, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansel-v-ford-motor-co-gactapp-1915.