Stansbury v. Stansbury

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stansbury v. Stansbury

145 So. 2d 889

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 1962

DocketNo. 62-169

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 So. 2d 889 (Stansbury v. Stansbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stansbury v. Stansbury, 145 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final decree rendered in a divorce suit. The appellee Frank H. Stansbury, sued his wife Vira P. Stans-bury for divorce. She counterclaimed for divorce and for alimony. The cause was tried before the chancellor, whose decree granted the husband a divorce, denied the wife’s counterclaim and decreed, on evidence which the court found to be clear and convincing, that certain realty held jointly was the property of the husband. The parties married in 1945. The husband is 83 and the wife 44 years of age. The several questions presented on the appeal have been considered in the light of the record and briefs and are found to be without merit. The cause appears to have been fully and fairly tried, and the decision rendered was, in its several aspects, adequately supported by the evidence. No reversible error having been shown, the decree appealed from should be and hereby is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final decree rendered in a divorce suit. The appellee Frank H. Stansbury, sued his wife Vira P. Stans-bury for divorce. She counterclaimed for divorce and for alimony. The cause was tried before the chancellor, whose decree granted the husband a divorce, denied the wife’s counterclaim and decreed, on evidence which the court found to be clear and convincing, that certain realty held jointly was the property of the husband. The parties married in 1945. The husband is 83 and the wife 44 years of age. The several questions presented on the appeal have been considered in the light of the record and briefs and are found to be without merit. The cause appears to have been fully and fairly tried, and the decision rendered was, in its several aspects, adequately supported by the evidence. No reversible error having been shown, the decree appealed from should be and hereby is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansbury-v-stansbury-fladistctapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack