Stansbury v. Marks
This text of 4 U.S. 130 (Stansbury v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stansbury
versus
Marks.
Supreme Court of United States.
By the COURT:
The evidence is clearly admissible. Under the general issue, however, the jury may decide, whether the evidence is sufficient to discharge him, or not. The position is generally true, that an infant can only bind himself for necessaries; yet, in the Court of Chancery, cases occur, in which a payment would be decreed, contrary to the strict rule of the common law. In this form of action, equity is the principal consideration; and, from necessity, the Courts of law, in Pennsylvania, adopt the principles of the English Courts of Chancery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 U.S. 130, 1 L. Ed. 771, 4 Dall. 130, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansbury-v-marks-scotus-1793.