Stansbury v. Director of Patuxent Institution
187 A.2d 859, 230 Md. 655, 1963 Md. LEXIS 584
Opinion
In this application for leave to appeal from a finding of defective delinquency, the applicant states merely that he “disagrees with the decision of the Court.” Assuming, without deciding, that this statement is in compliance with Rule 894 a 2 (a), we have examined the report of Dr. Boslow and find the evidence legally sufficient to support the judgment.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stansbury v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 187 A.2d 859, 230 Md. 655, 1963 Md. LEXIS 584 (Md. 1963).
187 A.2d 859 (Stansbury v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.