Stansbury v. Director of Patuxent Institution
This text of 187 A.2d 859 (Stansbury v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this application for leave to appeal from a finding of defective delinquency, the applicant states merely that he “disagrees with the decision of the Court.” Assuming, without deciding, that this statement is in compliance with Rule 894 a 2 (a), we have examined the report of Dr. Boslow and find the evidence legally sufficient to support the judgment.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 A.2d 859, 230 Md. 655, 1963 Md. LEXIS 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansbury-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1963.