Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Stansbury, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.

Stansbury, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.

102 A.3d 420, 628 Pa. 12, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2855
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 30, 2014
Docket138 EM 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.3d 420 (Stansbury, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stansbury, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., 102 A.3d 420, 628 Pa. 12, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2855 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Review and the Application for Emergency Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.3d 420, 628 Pa. 12, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansbury-k-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2014.