Stansberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stansberry v. State

388 S.W.3d 601, 2012 WL 6599719, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. ED 98472·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jherrit M. Stansberry appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jherrit M. Stansberry appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Stansberry v. State, 388 S.W.3d 601, 2012 WL 6599719, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 601 (Stansberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.