Stanovick v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.

161 A.D.2d 1212, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9336

This text of 161 A.D.2d 1212 (Stanovick v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanovick v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp., 161 A.D.2d 1212, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Motion to extend time granted to July 11, 1990; motion to dismiss denied with leave to renew after record is filed. Memorandum: No further extension to perfect the appeal will be granted based on any delay in stipulating or settling the record. We cannot determine from the papers before us whether the order appealed from, however denominated, is an order denying a motion for renewal. The motion is denied, therefore, with leave to renew after the record on appeal is filed. Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D.2d 1212, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanovick-v-donner-hanna-coke-corp-nyappdiv-1990.