Stanojkova v. Holder

645 F.3d 943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stanojkova v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 645 F.3d 943
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 17, 2011·No. 10-3327·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 16, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 10-3327

IVANKA STANOJKOVA, et al., Petitioners, Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

v.

Nos. A095-930-601 & A095-930-602 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

ORDER

This court’s opinion issued on July 14, 2011, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 3, last sentence: the sentence should end with the word "opinion." The words “by a “panel” consisting of one member of the Board” should be deleted.

On page 4, second line after third paragraph break: delete "member".

On page 5, second sentence after indented quotation: the words "member of the"

should be deleted; also the words "who reviewed the judge's decision". Same page, same paragraph, last sentence: delete "member".

On page 7, second paragraph, first sentence: delete "member of the" and "who constituted the appellate tribunal". Also in this sentence "he would" should be "it would" and "he seems" should be "it seems". In the next sentence, "of his opinion he said" should be "of its 10-3327 Page 2

opinion the Board said"; and, delete "[the royal 'we']". On the same line, "He affirmed" should be "The Board affirmed".

On page 8, first line: delete "member".

On page 10, first line after first paragraph break: delete "member".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanojkova v. Holder, 645 F.3d 943 (7th Cir. 2011).

645 F.3d 943 (Stanojkova v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chun Hua Zheng v. Eric H. Holder, J
666 F.3d 1064 (Seventh Circuit, 2012)