Stannus v. Heiserman

39 N.W.2d 782, 73 S.D. 157, 1949 S.D. LEXIS 54
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stannus v. Heiserman. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 S.D. 567
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 1949·No. File No. 9023.·Published

Opinion

The opinion filed in this cause and appearing in 72 S.D. 567,38 N.W.2d 130, inadvertently states that Lawrence County furnished but two stringers for use in the 1944 reconstruction of the bridge therein described. In truth, all of the new stringers used in the reconstruction of the bridge were furnished by Lawrence County. A petition for rehearing, which called this erroneous statement of fact to our attention, was granted and the case has been reargued and reconsidered. The court, by action of a majority of the judges, has determined to adhere to its original opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stannus v. Heiserman, 39 N.W.2d 782, 73 S.D. 157, 1949 S.D. LEXIS 54 (S.D. 1949).

39 N.W.2d 782 (Stannus v. Heiserman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stannus v. Heiserman
38 N.W.2d 130 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1949)