Stanly v. . Cummins
1 N.C. 21
This text of 1 N.C. 21 (Stanly v. . Cummins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stanly v. . Cummins, 1 N.C. 21 (N.C. Ct. App. 1789).
Opinion
WILLIAMS, J., said it was simply a demand for so much money. said the jury were sworn to ascertain the damages sustained, and they might consider the difference in the value of money.
The other Judges assented, but without charging the jury.
All the Judges present.
NOTE. — Such a note would not be negotiable. See Hodges v.Clinton, post, 53, and the cases there referred to in the note.
(22)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanly-v-cummins-ncsuperct-1789.