Stanley Wayne Robertson v. State

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00105-CR

STANLEY WAYNE ROBERTSON, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-04337-CRF-85

ORDER

Appellant’s Motion to Obtain Complete Electronic Copy of Record on Appeal was filed on March 18, 2014.

Appellant contends in the motion that the trial court has denied permission to reproduce the record and disseminate the record outside appellant’s counsel’s office. The Court has no copy of a motion, a hearing, if any, or an order on this issue from the trial court.

Further, to the extent this motion could relate to the clerk’s record, which is unclear from the motion, all but one order sealing records were based on motions filed by appellant and were to preserve the attorney-client privilege and work product of appellant’s counsel. The Court needs clarification as to whether appellant and his trial counsel are waiving the attorney-client privilege and work product of counsel protected in the sealing orders by requesting that copies of those sealed items be included in the publicly available appellate record.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion is denied without prejudice of refiling same subject to the above mentioned clarifications.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion denied Order issued and filed April 3, 2014

Robertson v. State Page 2