Stanley v. William Davies Co., Inc.
This text of 467 F.2d 486 (Stanley v. William Davies Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
467 F.2d 486
Kenneth STANLEY, d/b/a Wayne Maid Farms, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM DAVIES CO., INC., d/b/a Shur-Gain Feed Division of
William Davies Co., Inc. and also d/b/a Swisher
Feed Division of William Davies Co.,
Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-2751 Summary Calendar.**
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 1972.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed: See Local Rule 21.1 The charge to the jury with respect to the inference to be drawn from the failure of appellant to produce witnesses was warranted and therefore not error. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Company v. Perry, 5 Cir., 1964, 326 F.2d 921, 924-925.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 F.2d 486, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-william-davies-co-inc-ca5-1972.