Stanley v. United States
502 U.S. 845, 112 S. Ct. 141, 116 L. Ed. 2d 108, 60 U.S.L.W. 3260, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 5590
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 1991·No. No. 90-8343·Published·Cited by 102 cases
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanley v. United States, 502 U.S. 845, 112 S. Ct. 141, 116 L. Ed. 2d 108, 60 U.S.L.W. 3260, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 5590 (1991).
502 U.S. 845 (Stanley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Santos
541 F.3d 63 (Second Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Gilley
279 F. App'x 19 (Second Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Munoz Franco
307 F. Supp. 2d 340 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)
State v. Mann
818 A.2d 122 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)
Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I
23 P.3d 440 (Washington Supreme Court, 2001)
United States v. Bonnet-Grullon
53 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D. New York, 1999)
United States v. Sainato
53 F. Supp. 2d 316 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Vaughn v. King
167 F.3d 347 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)
Whaley v. Thompson
22 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (D. Oregon, 1998)
Goren v. New Vision International, Inc.
156 F.3d 721 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Otto v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
134 F.3d 841 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Walker
980 F. Supp. 144 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
Boyce v. Woodruff
979 F. Supp. 817 (N.D. Indiana, 1997)
Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware Corporation
116 F.3d 1161 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
United States Parole Commission v. Noble
693 A.2d 1084 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
United States of America, and v. Doloras Contreras, and Cross-Appellee
108 F.3d 1255 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Goldstein v. United States Parole Commission
940 F. Supp. 1505 (C.D. California, 1996)
United States v. Herbert Marvin Feinberg
89 F.3d 333 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Matthew Noble v. United States Parole Commission
82 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Charles Antoin Novey
78 F.3d 1483 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)