Stanley v. Suggs

23 Ga. 137
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

Believing that this case comes fully within the rule laid down by this Court, in Rushin vs. Shields, et al. (11 Ga. Rep. 636) we affirm the judgment of the Court below.

The subsequent case of Dinkins and Moore, (17 Ga. Rep. 62) stands upon a different principle. The doctrine intended to be maintained there, was, that even in the absence of any attestation clause, the official signature of the magistrate stood in lieu of the proof of execution; he being an officer chosen and selected by the law for this purpose.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley v. Suggs, 23 Ga. 137 (Ga. 1857).

23 Ga. 137 (Stanley v. Suggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.
126 S.E. 879 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
In re Hammett
286 F. 392 (N.D. Georgia, 1923)
Hansen v. Owens
64 S.E. 800 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Ober & Son Co.
84 Ga. 294 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)