Stanley v. State
768 S.W.2d 213, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 1989 WL 16420
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stanley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 449 →
Opinion
[214]*214ORDER
Movant, Rollan Stanley, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanley v. State, 768 S.W.2d 213, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 1989 WL 16420 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
768 S.W.2d 213 (Stanley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.