Stanley v. State
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JAN-2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 02:16 PM
EDWARD G. STANLEY, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 17-1-0007; (CR. NO. 1PC880000418))
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Morikawa, in place of Pollack, J., recused)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Edward G. Stanley’s application for writ of certiorari filed on December 2, 2019, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 16, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Trish K. Morikawa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanley v. State (Stanley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.