Stanley v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stanley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Haw. 489
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided January 16, 2020·No. SCWC-18-0000141·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JAN-2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 02:16 PM

EDWARD G. STANLEY, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 17-1-0007; (CR. NO. 1PC880000418))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Morikawa, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Edward G. Stanley’s application for writ of certiorari filed on December 2, 2019, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 16, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Trish K. Morikawa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley v. State, (haw 2020).

Stanley v. State (Stanley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.