Stanley v. State
This text of Stanley v. State (Stanley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JAN-2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 02:16 PM ________________________________________________________________
EDWARD G. STANLEY, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 17-1-0007; (CR. NO. 1PC880000418))
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Morikawa, in place of Pollack, J., recused)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Edward G. Stanley’s application for writ of certiorari filed on December 2, 2019, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 16, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Trish K. Morikawa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stanley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-state-haw-2020.