Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Stanley v. State

Stanley v. State

861 S.W.2d 550, 314 Ark. 411, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 545
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 11, 1993
DocketCR 93-919
StatusPublished

This text of 861 S.W.2d 550 (Stanley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanley v. State, 861 S.W.2d 550, 314 Ark. 411, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 545 (Ark. 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Susan Stanley by her attorney, Michael D. Ray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney admits that the record was tendered late in an affidavit submitted in response to our per curiam order of September 20, 1993, and accepts responsibility.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 S.W.2d 550, 314 Ark. 411, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-state-ark-1993.