Stanley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Stanley v. State

110 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 695

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 7, 1926

Docket6 Div. 966.

StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 926 (Stanley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley v. State, 110 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 695 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment in the circuit court on a charge of violating the prohibition law, the defendant interposed a plea of guilty; but, notwithstanding this plea, when judgment was pronounced and entered, he appealed therefrom to this court. It is evident that this appeal is for delay only. No points of decision are involved, as there is no bill of exceptions, and the record upon which the appeal is predicated is clearly without error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment in the circuit court on a charge of violating the prohibition law, the defendant interposed a plea of guilty; but, notwithstanding this plea, when judgment was pronounced and entered, he appealed therefrom to this court. It is evident that this appeal is for delay only. No points of decision are involved, as there is no bill of exceptions, and the record upon which the appeal is predicated is clearly without error. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-state-alactapp-1926.