Stanley v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stanley v. Stanley

81 A.D.2d 762, 439 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11396

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 762 (Stanley v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley v. Stanley, 81 A.D.2d 762, 439 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 3, 1980, denying motion for joint custody, and for other relief, and directing a hearing as to financial provisions, is unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to direct that the reference shall be extended to include the issue of visitation, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. The change of the husband’s residence from Canada to New York, where the wife and child reside, is a sufficient change of circumstances to justify an examination of the issue of visitation and whatever may be the ultimate determination of that issue. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 3, 1980, denying motion for joint custody, and for other relief, and directing a hearing as to financial provisions, is unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to direct that the reference shall be extended to include the issue of visitation, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. The change of the husband’s residence from Canada to New York, where the wife and child reside, is a sufficient change of circumstances to justify an examination of the issue of visitation and whatever may be the ultimate determination of that issue. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 762, 439 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-stanley-nyappdiv-1981.