Stanley v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
This text of 324 S.W.2d 398 (Stanley v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by Eunice M. Stanley for an appeal from a judgment cancelling a health and accident insurance policy which had been issued to her by the Prudential Insurance Company of America. The ground of cancellation was material misrepresentations in the application for the policy.
Under the decision in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Tannenbaum, Ky., 240 S.W.2d 566, the judgment was correct. The appellant argues that the Tannenbaum case is wrong in principle and should be overruled. This argument has failed to find acceptance by a majority of the Court.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 S.W.2d 398, 1959 Ky. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-kyctapp-1959.