Stanley v. Neale

98 Mass. 343
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 98 Mass. 343 (Stanley v. Neale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanley v. Neale, 98 Mass. 343 (Mass. 1867).

Opinion

Chapman, J.

The plaintiff excepts to no finding or decision of the judge except his order for a return. But it had been found that the plaintiff had no title to the property replevied; that the title was in Selden, and that the defendant Neale was his agent. Upon the finding of these facts, the order was correct. For a plaintiff in replevin must maintain his case on the strength of his own title, and, if he fails, the' possession ought, as a general rule, to be restored to the defendant. Johnson v. Neale, 6 Allen, 229. This case does not furnish an exception to the rule, but comes c’early within it

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Steel & Iron Co. v. Wooster
59 A.2d 341 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1948)
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Flowers
185 N.E. 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Field v. Fletcher
78 N.E. 107 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Hall v. Southern Pacific Co.
57 P. 617 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1899)
Baker v. Seavey
40 N.E. 863 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 Mass. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-neale-mass-1867.