Stanley v. Moore

173 S.E. 190, 48 Ga. App. 704, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 167
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1934·No. 23270·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where a person says to another, of a young woman who had. visited him in his office alone on a business errand, that she, while in his office, did not act like a “lady,” and this was said to her employer, [705] and Concerning her conduct in the transaction of the business for which she was employed, after she had gone to the office of the person who made this remark about her, and on account thereof she lost her job, they were made of her in reference to her trade or profession, and were calculated to injure her therein. Where the charge was false and she had done nothing to justify it, it amounted to slander for which an action in damages lies as provided in the third division of section 4433 of the Civil Code of 1910.

Decided March 3, 1934. Carpenter & Bilis, for plaintiff. Bryan, Middlebroolcs & Carter, for defendant.

2. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley v. Moore, 173 S.E. 190, 48 Ga. App. 704, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

173 S.E. 190 (Stanley v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGee v. Gast
572 S.E.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Yandle v. Mitchell Motors, Inc
404 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Huey v. Sechler
130 S.E.2d 754 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Rogers v. Adams
105 S.E.2d 364 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Cochran v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
34 S.E.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)