Stanley v. Koehler

New York Court of Common Pleas

Stanley v. Koehler

1 Hilt. 354

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedJune 15, 1857

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Hilt. 354 (Stanley v. Koehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley v. Koehler, 1 Hilt. 354 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Ikgbaham, Eikst Judge. —

I think the evidence shows a surrender on the 1st December with the plaintiff’s assent.

The plaintiff admitted on the trial, that, when he was informed of the defendant’s intended removal on the first of December he said he should have to get some one to hire his power, and gave the defendant permission to leave some of his property on the premises after that date, diving such permission is evidence from which an acceptance may be presumed, and if so, no rent could accrue thereafter.

The justice erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ikgbaham, Eikst Judge. —

I think the evidence shows a surrender on the 1st December with the plaintiff’s assent.

The plaintiff admitted on the trial, that, when he was informed of the defendant’s intended removal on the first of December he said he should have to get some one to hire his power, and gave the defendant permission to leave some of his property on the premises after that date, diving such permission is evidence from which an acceptance may be presumed, and if so, no rent could accrue thereafter.

The justice erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Hilt. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-koehler-nyctcompl-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack