Stanley v. Greenwood

24 Tex. 224
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, C. J.

A homestead necessarily includes the idea of residence. But it will not be said that the plaintiff had his residence in his law office, or that the office in question was his residence. A law office may be connected with, and used as a [225]*225part of a dwelling-house, and thus, by its use, be brought within the homestead exemption. (Pryor v. Stone, 19 Texas Rep. 371.) But that an office, used only as a law office, by a single man, is not within the meaning of the law, or in any just sense of the term, a homestead, is too plain for argument. The case of Philleo v. Smalley, (23 Texas Rep. 498,) is decisive of the present-. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley v. Greenwood, 24 Tex. 224 (Tex. 1859).

24 Tex. 224 (Stanley v. Greenwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Cox
80 Fla. 63 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
McCray v. Miller &8212 Bland v. Bland
1919 OK 283 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Oliver v. Snowden
18 Fla. 823 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)
Greeley v. Scott
10 F. Cas. 1072 (United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida, 1875)