Stanley v. Great Glam, Inc.
This text of 161 So. 3d 457 (Stanley v. Great Glam, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brittanie Stanley appeals a final judgment that was entered based on the trial court’s earlier decision to dismiss a claim of pregnancy discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, which is codified at sections 760.01 through 760.11 and section 509.092 of the Florida Statutes. The limited issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy by an employer in Florida. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court interpreted section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), as prohibiting discrimination by an employer on the basis of pregnancy. See Delva v. Cont’l Grp., Inc., 137 So.3d 371 (Fla.2014). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 So. 3d 457, 2014 WL 2601610, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-great-glam-inc-fladistctapp-2014.