Stanley v. Gray

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1134

DAVID STANLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

LAZARON VENTURES, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

versus

GERALD LEE GRAY; PAUL DARRELL SMITH; J. ROBERT STUMP; J. JACK KENNEDY, JR.; CAROLINE STEVENS; COMMUNITY BASED CORRECTIONS; COUNTY OF WISE, VIRGINIA, a public entity; GREGORY KALLEN; BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, INCORPORATED; ANTHONY E. COLLINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00031-jpj)

Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Stanley, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Daniel Robert Bieger, COPELAND & BIEGER, PC, Abingdon, Virginia; George Walerian Chabalewski, James Van Ingold, James Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Tarek F.M. Saad, HOLLAND & HART, LLP, Denver, Colorado; Michael Edward Anderson, MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Mark B. Wiletsky, HOLLAND & HART, Boulder, Colorado, for Appellees. Anthony E. Collins, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

David Kim Stanley appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying

his motions to amend his complaint and to name defendant John Doe,

and dismissing his state law claims without prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Stanley v. Gray, No. 2:06-cv-00031-jpj

(W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -