Stanley Tener v. Sézanne Arlitt

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 5, 2011·No. 01-09-01091-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 5, 2011

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-09-01091-CV

———————————

Stanley Tener, Appellant

V.

Sézanne Arlitt, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2007-53880

MEMORANDUM O P I N I O N

Appellant Stanley Tener has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (allowing involuntary dismissal).

          We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley Tener v. Sézanne Arlitt, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Stanley Tener v. Sézanne Arlitt (Stanley Tener v. Sézanne Arlitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.