Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK STANLEY RUBENSTEIN, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant JEFFERIES FINANCIAL GROUP INC., Plaintiff, -against- 20 CIVIL 2775 (PAC) JUDGMENT LINDA L. ADAMANY, BARRY J. ALPERIN, ROBERT D. BEYER, FRANCISCO L. BORGES, W. PATRICK CAMPBELL, PAUL M. DOUGAN, BRIAN P. FRIEDMAN, MARY ANNE GILMARTIN, RICHARD B. HANDLER, ALAN J. HIRSCHFIELD, JAMES E. JORDAN, ROBERT E. JOYAL, JACOB M. KATZ, JEFFREY C. KEIL, MICHAEL T. O'KANE, JESSE CLYDE NICHOLS, II, STUART H. REESE, MICHAEL SORKIN, JOSEPH S. STEINBERG, Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 28, 2022, the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Section 14(a). Because amendment would be futile, see Document Techs., Inc. v. LDiscovery, LLC, 731 F. App'x 31, 33 (2d Cir. 2018), the Court has GRANTED the motion to dismiss; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 29, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court BY: dK (Margo Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany (Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.