Stanley McCurley, Individually and D/B/A Phoenix Water Works v. Moore Station W.S.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Stanley McCurley, Individually and D/B/A Phoenix Water Works v. Moore Station W.S.C.

DecidedDecember 20, 2006

Docket12-06-00252-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Stanley McCurley, Individually and D/B/A Phoenix Water Works v. Moore Station W.S.C. (Stanley McCurley, Individually and D/B/A Phoenix Water Works v. Moore Station W.S.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley McCurley, Individually and D/B/A Phoenix Water Works v. Moore Station W.S.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

DISMISSAL FORM FOR CRIMINAL CASES ON ANT'S MOTION/OR WD NOA

NO. 12-06-00252-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

STANLEY MCCURLEY, INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A PHOENIX WATER WORKS, § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

MOORE STATION W.S.C.,

APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Stanley McCurley, individually and doing business as McCurley Water Systems and as Phoenix Water Works, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In his motion, McCurley states that all matters of fact and issues in controversy have been fully and finally compromised and settled by the parties. A copy of the motion has been sent to all counsel of record. Because McCurley has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion delivered December 20, 2006.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISMISSAL FORM FOR CRIMINAL CASES ON ANT'S MOTION/OR WD NOA

NO. 12-06-00252-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

STANLEY MCCURLEY, INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A PHOENIX WATER WORKS, § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

MOORE STATION W.S.C.,

APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Stanley McCurley, individually and doing business as McCurley Water Systems and as Phoenix Water Works, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In his motion, McCurley states that all matters of fact and issues in controversy have been fully and finally compromised and settled by the parties. A copy of the motion has been sent to all counsel of record. Because McCurley has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion delivered December 20, 2006.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Stanley McCurley, Individually and D/B/A Phoenix Water Works v. Moore Station W.S.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-mccurley-individually-and-dba-phoenix-wate-texapp-2006.