Stanley Marsh & Sons, Inc. v. Niagara Distributors, Inc.

670 So. 2d 1176, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3328, 1996 WL 148870
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1996·No. No. 95-2719·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Genuine issues of material fact exist which preclude the entry of a summary judgment on appellant’s claims for conversion, misrepresentation and trespass. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Serchay v. NTS Fort Lauderdale Office Joint Venture, 657 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Brock v. Associates Fin., Inc., 625 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting summary judgment against appellant, Stanley Marsh & Sons, Inc., and remand this cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley Marsh & Sons, Inc. v. Niagara Distributors, Inc., 670 So. 2d 1176, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3328, 1996 WL 148870 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1176 (Stanley Marsh & Sons, Inc. v. Niagara Distributors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hastings v. State
670 So. 2d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)