Stanley M. Feil, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

Stanley M. Feil, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

674 F.2d 567, 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2744, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20545

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1982

Docket80-1547

StatusPublished

This text of 674 F.2d 567 (Stanley M. Feil, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley M. Feil, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 674 F.2d 567, 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2744, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20545 (6th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board 250 NLRB No. 143 (July 28,1980) by Stanley M. Feil, Inc., and on review of the briefs and oral argument in said case wherein the Board had found that the petitioner had violated section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by coercively interrogating employees, by threatening less desirable working conditions and by granting a new benefit, hospitalization coverage, during the union’s organizing efforts; and noting that the Board also found an appropriate bargaining unit consisting of petitioner’s warehouse employees and entered a Gissel -type of bargaining order pertaining to said unit on the basis of violations previously catalogued; and further on review of the record, this court having determined that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the whole record and that its bargaining order is appropriate under NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969) because although the unfair labor practices found are less than “outrageous and pervasive,” nonetheless the Board found that they were sufficient to tend to undermine the union’s majority strength and interfere with the electoral process;

Now therefore, enforcement of the Board’s order should be and hereby is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board 250 NLRB No. 143 (July 28,1980) by Stanley M. Feil, Inc., and on review of the briefs and oral argument in said case wherein the Board had found that the petitioner had violated section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by coercively interrogating employees, by threatening less desirable working conditions and by granting a new benefit, hospitalization coverage, during the union’s organizing efforts; and noting that the Board also found an appropriate bargaining unit consisting of petitioner’s warehouse employees and entered a Gissel -type of bargaining order pertaining to said unit on the basis of violations previously catalogued; and further on review of the record, this court having determined that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the whole record and that its bargaining order is appropriate under NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969) because although the unfair labor practices found are less than “outrageous and pervasive,” nonetheless the Board found that they were sufficient to tend to undermine the union’s majority strength and interfere with the electoral process;

Now therefore, enforcement of the Board’s order should be and hereby is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 F.2d 567, 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2744, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-m-feil-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack