Stanley, John v. Batesville Casket

2020 TN WC 16
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedFebruary 4, 2020
Docket2019-05-0391
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 16 (Stanley, John v. Batesville Casket) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanley, John v. Batesville Casket, 2020 TN WC 16 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

JOHN STANLEY, ) Docket No. 2019-05-0391 Employee, )

V. )

BATESVILLE CASKET, ) State File No. 22719-2019 Employer, )

and )

FARMINGTON CASUALTY CO. ) Judge Dale Tipps Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED BENEFITS

This case came before the Court on January 30, 2020, for an Expedited Hearing. The threshold issue is whether Mr. Stanley’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations.’ For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Stanley is unlikely to establish at a hearing on the merits that he timely filed his claim. Therefore, the Court holds that he is not entitled to benefits at this time.

History of Claim

Mr. Stanley is a long-time employee at Batesville. On November 22, 2017, his right shoulder began hurting at work. Mr. Stanley did not realize he injured his shoulder but thought it was just sore. He continued trying to work through his discomfort and pain to the point that he could barely move his arm.

A few weeks later, Mr. Stanley took his mother to her orthopedic surgeon appointment. While there, the doctor examined Mr. Stanley’s shoulder and said he probably had a torn rotator cuff.

' Other issues before the Court are notice and medical causation. Because of the Court’s statute of limitations holding, it is unnecessary to address these issues at this time.

1 Mr. Stanley notified his supervisor of the injury around January 9, 2018. Batesville provided medical treatment at its on-site clinic on January 10 and 18 but later denied the claim.

Mr. Stanley sought treatment on his own, including rotator cuff repair surgery. His health insurance carrier denied payment on the grounds that his injury was work- related. Mr. Stanley stated that he is back at work and only wants his medical bills paid.

Among its other arguments, Batesville contended that the statute of limitations bars Mr. Stanley’s claim. It asked the Court to deny his request.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Stanley must provide sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2019); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Applying this standard to the facts of this case, the Court cannot find that Mr. Stanley is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits of his claim.

Tennessee’s workers’ compensation law provides the following statute of limitations for initiating a claim:

In instances when the employer has voluntarily paid workers’ compensation benefits, within one (1) year following the accident resulting in injury, the right to compensation is forever barred, unless a petition for benefit determination is filed with the bureau on a form prescribed by the administrator within one (1) year from the latter of the date of the last authorized treatment or the time the employer ceased to make payments of compensation to or on behalf of the employee.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2). Further:

The employer has the burden of proof to establish facts which the employer claims as a bar to the workers’ compensation claim, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations. When, however, a defendant establishes an affirmative defense, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to demonstrate a recognized exception.

Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 647 (Tenn. 2008).

Mr. Stanley testified that Batesville never paid temporary disability benefits and

2 provided no medical treatment after January 18, 2018. He did not file his Petition for Benefit Determination until March 20, 2019, fourteen months later. Because he failed to file within one year of the last authorized treatment and failed to demonstrate a recognized exception, the Court must hold that Mr. Stanley is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1.

Mr. Stanley’s claim against Batesville Casket for the requested medical and temporary disability benefits are denied at this time.

This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on April 21, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. You must call toll-free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are set using Central Time.

ENTERED February 4, 2020.

ee

L— ~ (FLEE 2

Judge Dale Tipps Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

AMR WDS

Affidavit of John Stanley

Records from Tennessee Orthopedic Alliance

Medical bills

October 24, 2019 note from Dr. Edward Glenn

Records from Linda Williams, APN, and Kelsey Purcell, PA Collective medical records

Technical record:

WR wWNS

Petition for Benefit Determination Dispute Certification Notice

Request for Expedited Hearing Employer’s Prehearing Brief Employer’s Witness and Exhibit List CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on February 4, 2020.

Name Certified | Email | Service Sent To Mail John C. Stanley xX Calvinstanley909 @ gmail.com Sarah Best, xX shbest @ mijs.com Employer’s Attorney

/) / Linuny wt inl

Penny Shrujn} Court Clerk Court of Wh/kers? Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk @tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Company
274 S.W.3d 638 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-john-v-batesville-casket-tennworkcompcl-2020.