Stanley G. Flag & Co. v. Taylor

14 A. 26, 13 Del. 165, 8 Houston 165, 1888 Del. LEXIS 9
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMay 3, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 A. 26 (Stanley G. Flag & Co. v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanley G. Flag & Co. v. Taylor, 14 A. 26, 13 Del. 165, 8 Houston 165, 1888 Del. LEXIS 9 (Del. Ct. App. 1888).

Opinion

Comegys, Ch. J.,

gave the opinion of the Court, in which he said that every affidavit of a legal defence to the whole or a part of any cause' of action in any case in which a sworn copy of it is filed pursuant to the statute, must disclose the nature and character of that defense sufficiently to show to the court on the face of it, admitting the matter or matters of facts alleged in it to be true, that it constitutes a legal defence to the action in the case. This the affidavit of defence filed in this case wholly fails to disclose, and therefore judgment must be entered for the plaintiff on the motion, notwithstanding the affidavit of defence filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Universal Life Co.
180 A. 328 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A. 26, 13 Del. 165, 8 Houston 165, 1888 Del. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-g-flag-co-v-taylor-delsuperct-1888.