Stanley Freeman v. Sumiko Freeman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 16, 2015·No. 04-15-00453-CV·Published

Opinion

/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00453-CV

Stanley FREEMAN, Appellant

v.

Sumiko FREEMAN, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1998-CI-13915 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER On September 15, 2015, appellant filed a motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. In the motion, appellant states the brief is currently due September 18, 2015. This is incorrect. Currently, only the clerk’s record has been filed. The reporter’s record is currently due September 30, 2015, pursuant to the Rule 37.3 letter we sent to the reporter on August 31, 2015. Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the reporter’s record is filed. We therefore DENY AS MOOT appellant’s motion to extend time to file the brief.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley Freeman v. Sumiko Freeman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Stanley Freeman v. Sumiko Freeman (Stanley Freeman v. Sumiko Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.